{"id":2770,"date":"2023-02-09T19:05:11","date_gmt":"2023-02-09T19:05:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/orchid-panther-716643.hostingersite.com\/2023-2-9-nuke-to-fusion\/"},"modified":"2026-01-09T10:15:59","modified_gmt":"2026-01-09T10:15:59","slug":"nuke-to-fusion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jordalefou.com\/es\/2023\/02\/09\/nuke-to-fusion\/","title":{"rendered":"\/\/ de Nuke a Fusion (gu\u00eda r\u00e1pida)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\n\n\n

Como Nuke<\/strong> is becoming pretty expensive, I\u2019ve licensed a Fusion\/Resolve<\/strong> which reminds me my old Flame\/Smoke<\/strong> workflow. <\/h4>\n\n\n\n

On this article you will find a comparative and some tips for fast boarding Fusion if you are Nuke user.<\/h2>\n\n\n\n


(Updated April 2025)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

\/ Intro to \u201cAll in One philosophy\u201d<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n

(This is a intro regarding finishing softwares, so if you are hurry jump to next section).<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I did two Portugal Tv movies around 2010 just using Autodesk Smoke.
It was great to do color grading, all the vfx and title design inside a single app<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The advantajes on this system is that you have your TIMELINE and you can store any vfx at every clip cut<\/strong>, including motion graphics or any magic touch required. This is FAST<\/strong> and useful when you have a lot of shots to do and you are the SINGLE artist<\/strong>, as it use to be in the old times, mostly in advertisement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This ALL IN ONE philosophy<\/strong> was implemented in Nuke Studio around 2016, but I don\u2019t know who is using it. Probably as Nuke Studio is a slow player and just used for conforming and export<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Instead Flame\/Smoke always have been the best for REAL TIME<\/strong> as they use to be driven by a single artist and before 2010 old material use to be ingested by tapes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Discreet use to have different levels for VFX: form Edit to Fire, Smoke, Flame and Inferno, but around 2012 aprox. Flame become a ALL IN ONE, including Smoke full editorial interface and Lustre for color grading etc. This \u201call in one\u201d phylosophy, blending editorial and finishing, has become kind of standard on all the \u201cStudio\u201d packages<\/strong> (Nuke Studio, Flame Premium, Resolve, Adobe Studio, etc.).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is a contradiction in the thing that: for complex productions the Studio packages are just used for conforming or playing<\/strong> the clips. As I\u2019ve say, Nuke Hiero was designed to replace Flame, but nobody use it as standalone Vfx station<\/em>. And sadly in most of the companys Flame become just a \u201cplayer\u201d as general vfx work was done in Nuke<\/strong> by individual artists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now we also have several image sequence players as Rv<\/strong> o Shotgun<\/strong> for show playlist to clients, so this \u201con suite\u201d to do vfx and \u201cshow it\u201d belongs to dinosaurs nowdays. What\u2019s the point then regarding have a Studio software? The point is: for supervision and for use as small studios or independent artists.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Davinci Resolve Studio can be used instead of Autodesk Flame. Is cheaper and worth.<\/strong> And can be used instead of Nuke, as it has also python, camera tracker, particles, etc. But this use is just a recomendation for small studios or single driven artist.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I will test it and watch pros and contras<\/strong>. This is a work in progress list, so will be updated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

\/ Contras<\/strong>:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>\n\n\n\n